Lawyer For Child Porn In Henrico County Virginia

Lawyer For Child Porn In Henrico County Virginia Violation Code 18.2-374.1:1

In Virginia, possession of child pornography is a criminal offense under Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-374.1:1 and is punishable as a Class 6 felony.

Below is a sample case of possession of child porn in Virginia as interpreted by a lawyer in our firm.

Have you been charged with possession of child porn in Virginia and need a lawyer to defend your child porn case in Virginia?

Are you concerned about the consequences of being charged with possession of child pornography in Virginia?

Under Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-374.1:1,

“A. Any person who knowingly possesses child pornography is guilty of a Class 6 felony.

B. Any person who commits a second or subsequent violation of subsection A is guilty of a Class 5 felony….”

For a lot of our clients, possession of child pornography can result in the loss of their job, their security clearance or even their immigration status.

Don’t risk going to court without a lawyer, if you have been charged with possession of child pornography in Virginia.  Contact our law firm for help and speak with a lawyer today.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Lawyer For Child Porn In Henrico County Virginia
Lawyer For Child Porn In Henrico County Virginia

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Edgar v. Commonwealth

Facts:

The Circuit Court of Henrico County, Virginia, convicted defendant of possession of child porn, in violation of Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-374.1:1, two counts of taking indecent liberties with a child, two counts of aggravated sexual battery, and object sexual penetration. Defendant appealed.

If you are facing a criminal case in Virginia, contact a SRIS Law Group lawyer for help.  You can reach us at 888-437-7747

Holdings:

The Virginia Court made the following holding:
  • Evidence of prior bad acts may properly be admitted: (1) to prove motive to commit the crime charged; (2) to establish guilty knowledge or to negate good faith; (3) to negate the possibility of mistake or accident; (4) to show the conduct and feeling of the accused toward his victim, or to establish their prior relations; (5) to prove opportunity; (6) to prove identity of the accused as the one who committed the crime where the prior criminal acts are so distinctive as to indicate a modus operandi; or (7) to demonstrate a common scheme or plan where the other crime or crimes constitute part of a general scheme of which the crime charged is a part. With respect to these exceptions, the test is whether the legitimate probative value outweighs the incidental prejudice to the accused.
  • If a witness answers a question on a collateral issue, the answer is conclusive and may not be contradicted with further evidence.

We have client meeting locations in Fairfax Prince William Richmond Loudoun Virginia Beach Fredericksburg Lynchburg.

Our law firm has the necessary experience to assist you with this matter.  We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Henrico Court House Detail:

Henrico Circuit Court

P. O. Box 90775
4301 East Par Road,
Henrico, VA 23273-0775

Henrico General District Court

P. O. Box 90775
4301 East Par Road,
Henrico, VA 23273-0775

Henrico Juvenile and Domestic Relations District Court

4201 E. Par Road,
Henrico, VA 23228-2745
P.O. Box 90775 Henrico, VA 23273-0775

Article written by A Sris
Click to Chat

Disclaimer:

These summaries are provided by the SRIS Law Group. They represent the firm’s unofficial views of the Justices’ opinions. The original opinions should be consulted for their authoritative content.